Learn

Microplastics: the latest worry from Fast Fashion

Another day, another unsettling fact about the fashion industry’s terrible impacts.

Textile is the 3rd largest contributor to plastic waste generation.

What does that mean? And to what extent does it affect us ?

The reliance of the fashion industry on Synthetic fibres at the origin of the problem:

You might have read or heard or about it before, but the fashion industry is increasingly relying on synthetic fibres-based garments. Cheap oil-derived materials like polyester or acrylic are dominating the market, making up for 62.5% of all fibres produced and being present in no less than 70% of all clothing items sold. The main reason being the affordability and scalability of plastic yarn production, allowing for the current overproducing model that Fast Fashion brands have embraced in the last 20+ years. The problem being that this automatically means that textiles that are being discarded at a faster rate, are in fact plastic textile waste. With 42 million tons of it being thrown away each year, fashion represents 13% of all plastic waste. However, not only are plastic textiles much harder (if not impossible) to recycle, but we've also started to realise that they release microplastics all along their lifespan.

What are microplastic fibres?

First, we need to understand what microfibres are. Microfibres are essentially small-sized particles that are released or shed into the environment from all kinds of fibrous materials (textiles), such as clothes, agricultural, industrial, and home textiles... This phenomenon occurs at all stages of the life cycle: during the production process, use, or the disposal and disintegration of the products.

Source: VOICE Ireland

Microfibres can originate from all textiles, natural of synthetic.

But as you might have guessed now, the issue lies with the synthetic ones. Remember that we are talking about plastic-like materials here: they don’t biodegrade. Once plastic is created, it doesn’t go away, it can only break down into smaller and smaller pieces. That is why microfibres that synthetic fabrics release are in fact micro-plastics. This type of pollution is irreversible and cumulating.

Even if the phenomenon has only recently started to be studied, we already have some pretty concerning information about it:

Source: Plastic Soupe report: Do clothes make us sick?

Poisoning ourselves

These microplastic are in fact just another way that we humans have found to poison themselves. Everytime we wash our clothes made of plastic, we pollute our own freshwater and down the line our whole food chain. But we also directly compromise the air we breathe since the shedding also accures just by wearing these clothes. The Plastic Soup report on microplastics estimates that 30% of our indoor environment and dust is made of microplastics, having direct effects on our health. Chronic inflammation induced by microplastic inhalation contributes to severe health ailments, including cancer, heart disease, asthma, and diabetes, children being particularly vulnerable.

Navigating the Solutions

While the inclination towards natural fibres seems like a (natural) solution, a little warning must be given. As mentioned before, all textiles shed microfibres. And even if natural fibres’ are on paper not harmful, they can be when the garment has been heavily treated with all sorts of chemicals during growing, manufacturing or finishing processes. The extent of the harm depends on how natural the fibre has been kept.

Regarding consumers, we recommend minimizing the purchase of synthetic clothing to items that require it such as outerwear, waterproof attire, and activewear. As always, keep it monofibre when possible, for better reuse/recycling potential. Additionally, there are several solutions available to capture microplastic fibres during the laundry process, including the use of speicifc nets, filtration balls, or washing machines filters. These actions can have a significantly help in mitigating microplastic pollution.

Source: less plastic.org.uk

Conclusion

Synthetic fabrics pose a particularly challenge due to their non-biodegradable nature. Once created, plastic persists indefinitely, disintegrating into microplastic fibres. This perpetual shedding during wear and laundering exacerbates oceanic pollution. This should be enough to challenge the domination of synthetic fibres in the fashion landscape and constitute a sufficient reason to phase out of unnecessary uses of plastic. The focus should be on creating and wearing fabrics that might cost a bit more and might not be as scalable as polyester but don’t harm the environment or our health.

Sources

De Falco, Francesca, et al. « The contribution of washing processes of synthetic clothes to microplastic pollution » . Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no 1, avril 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43023-x.

Greenpeace International. « What are microfibers and why are our clothes polluting the oceans ? - Greenpeace International » . Greenpeace International, 2 mars 2017, www.greenpeace.org/international/story/6956/what-are-microfibers-and-why-are-our-clothes-polluting-the-oceans.

« Microfibres : the plastic in our clothes » . Friends Of The Earth, friendsoftheearth.uk/plastics/microfibres-plastic-in-our-clothes.

Plastic Soup Foundation. Do Clothes Make Us Sick ? : Fashion, Fibres and Human Health. 2021, www.plasticsoupfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Do-clothes-make-us-sick-Fashion-fibers-and-human-health-PSF2022-.pdf.

Wolfe, Isobella. « What to Do About Microfibres in Clothing - Good On You » . Good On You, 18 décembre 2023, goodonyou.eco/what-to-do-about-microfibres.

You might also like
Start

Clothing banks: How to spot "the good ones"

alternative

end of life

discard clothes

guide

Imagine

Textile Labelling Revision

alternative

policy

Learn

The social impact of fast fashion

social injustice

manufacturing

social impact